Cosmetics
From
Contents |
Summary
Anti-chemical activists are trying to scare consumers about the safety of cosmetics and other personal care products.
Faulty Science
The activists' basic line of attack is that various chemicals can be detected in cosmetics and personal care products and that the mere presence of these chemicals is dangerous to health and/or the environment.
While it's true that some chemicals may be detected in some cosmetics and personal care products, their mere detection does not mean that the products are dangerous:
- Detection/exposure does not equal toxicity. A fundamental rule of toxicology is that "the dose makes the poison." All substances can be toxic at sufficiently high doses. The trace levels of chemicals detected in cosmetics and personal care products are substantially below exposures known to cause toxic effects.
- No FDA standards violated. Safe levels for ingredients in cosmetics and personal care products are set by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). There is no evidence that any FDA standards have been violated.
Agenda
- Anti-chemical/anti-business activists. The activists attacking cosmetics are politically-driven groups who tend to oppose chemicals and business.
- Targeting women. By attacking products near-and-dear to women, the activists hope to scare women into boycotting products and to enlist them as unwitting activists in campaigns against business/chemicals. The activist attack is predatory and demeaning in nature as it is based on the presumption that it is easy to scare women.
What You Can Do
- August 4, 2010. Take Action to Oppose SCA 2010 Efforts, Essential U Blog, August 4, 2010.
Additional Resources
Scares and Scams
- Antimicrobials
- Fragrances
- Lipstick
- Hair dye
- N-nitrosopiperadine
- Nantechnology (Cosmetics)
- Oxybenzone
- Parabens
- Phthalates
- Retinyl palmitate
- Safrole
- Sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS)/Sodium laureth sulfate (SLES)
- Sunscreen
- Talc
- Tannins
- Titanium dioxide
- Zinc oxide
Notable and Notorious
Articles
- Tell the EPA to Stay Away From Your Makeup!, JunkScienceMom.com, October 27, 2010.
- Cosmetics - The New Battleground, JunkScienceMom.com, October 6, 2010.
- Monrie-Hamilton, T, The Regulatory Danger of the 'Safe Cosmetics Act of 2010', NoisyRoom.net, September 28, 2010.
- Meyers L, Inventing A Boogeyman: Today Show Embraces Scare Science, Abandons Truth, Blogger News Network, September 20, 2010.
- (we already have a) Safe Cosmetics Act, Natural Bar Soap Company Blog, September 2, 2010.
- Foxon-Hill A, Toxins In, Toxins Out: The Campaign for Scaring the Pants Off Us, Personal Care Truth Blog, September 1, 2010.
- Zero Tolerance, Personal Care 101 Blog, August 30, 2010.
- Sanders C, I Have Been Lied to. I Feel Betrayed. Am I being Raped? Part – 2, Paul Penders Blog, August 26, 2010.
- Barker L, The Safe Cosmetics Act needs to be more in tune with science, CosmeticsDesign.com, August 25, 2010.
- Who put the lead in your lipstick?, My Beauty, My Skin Blog, August 25, 2010.
- Sanders C, Finally, I Have Worked Out What The Story of Cosmetics is Really About, Personal Care 101 Blog, August 24, 2010.
- Toxins In, Toxins Out – The Campaign for Scaring the pants off us, Realize Beauty Blog, August 24, 2010.
- Fioravanti K, The Bunny Effect of The Safe Cosmetics Act of 2010, Essential U Blog, August 16, 2010.
- Caswell E, The Precautionary Principle: A Cautionary Tale, GCDSpa Blog, August 2, 2010.
- Jones C, Do You Put Chemicals on Your Face? I Hope So., Sagescript Blog, July 21, 2010.
- Butterworth T, Nail Polish, Saran Wrap and Birth Defects, STATS.org, April 13, 2007.
- Butterworth T, How Activist Groups Run The News, STATS.org, January 31, 2007.
- Butterworth T, When Journalism Becomes a Health Hazard: Star Tribune Advocates “Self Education” on Consumer Safety, Chemical Risk, STATS.org, October 30, 2006.
- Goldin R, San Francisco Chronicle’s Cosmetic Scare, STATS.org, October 11, 2006.
- Butterworth T, A Cosmetic Victory for Public Health, STATS.org, September 8, 2006.
