Smoking

From

Summary

TBD.

Studies and Reports

• Knight J et al., Alcohol intake and cigarette smoking and risk of a contralateral breast cancer: The Women's Environmental Cancer and Radiation Epidemiology Study, Am J Epidemiol. 169(8):962-8April 15, 2009.
  • Abstract. "Women with primary breast cancer are at increased risk of developing second primary breast cancer. Few studies have evaluated risk factors for the development of asynchronous contralateral breast cancer in women with breast cancer. In the Women's Environmental Cancer and Radiation Epidemiology Study (1985-2001), the roles of alcohol and smoking were examined in 708 women with asynchronous contralateral breast cancer (cases) compared with 1,399 women with unilateral breast cancer (controls). Cases and controls aged less than 55 years at first breast cancer diagnosis were identified from 5 population-based cancer registries in the United States and Denmark. Controls were matched to cases on birth year, diagnosis year, registry region, and race and countermatched on radiation treatment. Risk factor information was collected by telephone interview. Rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by using conditional logistic regression. Ever regular drinking was associated with an increased risk of asynchronous contralateral breast cancer (rate ratio = 1.3, 95% confidence interval: 1.0, 1.6), and the risk increased with increasing duration (P = 0.03). Smoking was not related to asynchronous contralateral breast cancer. In this, the largest study of asynchronous contralateral breast cancer to date, alcohol is a risk factor for the disease, as it is for a first primary breast cancer."
• Hamajima N et al., Alcohol, tobacco and breast cancer--collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 58,515 women with breast cancer and 95,067 women without the disease, Br J Cancer. 18;87(11):1234-45, November 2002.
  • Abstract. "Alcohol and tobacco consumption are closely correlated and published results on their association with breast cancer have not always allowed adequately for confounding between these exposures. Over 80% of the relevant information worldwide on alcohol and tobacco consumption and breast cancer were collated, checked and analysed centrally. Analyses included 58,515 women with invasive breast cancer and 95,067 controls from 53 studies. Relative risks of breast cancer were estimated, after stratifying by study, age, parity and, where appropriate, women's age when their first child was born and consumption of alcohol and tobacco. The average consumption of alcohol reported by controls from developed countries was 6.0 g per day, i.e. about half a unit/drink of alcohol per day, and was greater in ever-smokers than never-smokers, (8.4 g per day and 5.0 g per day, respectively). Compared with women who reported drinking no alcohol, the relative risk of breast cancer was 1.32 (1.19-1.45, P<0.00001) for an intake of 35-44 g per day alcohol, and 1.46 (1.33-1.61, P<0.00001) for >/=45 g per day alcohol. The relative risk of breast cancer increased by 7.1% (95% CI 5.5-8.7%; P<0.00001) for each additional 10 g per day intake of alcohol, i.e. for each extra unit or drink of alcohol consumed on a daily basis. This increase was the same in ever-smokers and never-smokers (7.1% per 10 g per day, P<0.00001, in each group). By contrast, the relationship between smoking and breast cancer was substantially confounded by the effect of alcohol. When analyses were restricted to 22 255 women with breast cancer and 40 832 controls who reported drinking no alcohol, smoking was not associated with breast cancer (compared to never-smokers, relative risk for ever-smokers=1.03, 95% CI 0.98-1.07, and for current smokers=0.99, 0.92-1.05). The results for alcohol and for tobacco did not vary substantially across studies, study designs, or according to 15 personal characteristics of the women; nor were the findings materially confounded by any of these factors. If the observed relationship for alcohol is causal, these results suggest that about 4% of the breast cancers in developed countries are attributable to alcohol. In developing countries, where alcohol consumption among controls averaged only 0.4 g per day, alcohol would have a negligible effect on the incidence of breast cancer. In conclusion, smoking has little or no independent effect on the risk of developing breast cancer; the effect of alcohol on breast cancer needs to be interpreted in the context of its beneficial effects, in moderation, on cardiovascular disease and its harmful effects on cirrhosis and cancers of the mouth, larynx, oesophagus and liver."
• Lumey L et al, Cigarette smoking and prostate cancer: no relation with six measures of lifetime smoking habits in a large case-control study among U.S. whites, Prostate. 33(3):195-200, November 1997.
  • Conclusion. "Our data provide the most complete dose-response smoking information to date, and support the findings from the majority of studies that prostate cancer is not associated with cigarette smoking."
• Heineman E et al., A prospective study of tobacco use and multiple myeloma: evidence against an association, Cancer Causes Control. 1992 Jan;3(1):31-6.
  • Abstract. "The relationship between the use of cigarettes and other tobacco products and the risk of multiple myeloma was examined in a cohort of nearly 250,000 American veterans followed prospectively for 26 years. Compared with men who had never tobacco, the risk of death from myeloma was not increased among current (relative risk [RR] = 0.9, 95 percent confidence interval [CI] = 0.8-1.2) or former (RR = 1.0, CI = 0.8-1.3) cigarette smokers, nor among users of chewing tobacco or snuff (RR = 1.0, CI = 0.4-2.3). Risk was only slightly and nonsignificantly increased among pipe or cigar smokers (RR = 1.2, CI = 0.9-1.5). There was no indication of increasing risk with amount of tobacco used or earlier age at first use. With over 90 percent power to detect a 30 percent increased risk of this tumor occurring among current cigarette smokers, this study provides the strongest evidence to date against an association of cigarette smoking with multiple myeloma."
• Moolgavkar S et al., Cigarette smoking and lung cancer: reanalysis of the British doctors' data, J Natl Cancer Inst. 15;81(6):415-20, March 1989.
  • Abstract. "Attention has focused recently on the recessive oncogenesis model, according to which inactivation of both alleles of specific genes leads to cancer. A mathematical formulation of this model was fitted to the lung cancer incidence data from a cohort study among British doctors. The model described the data well. One implication is that age influences lung cancer risk among smokers independently of duration of smoking. A study of dose-response within the framework of the model shows that the data are consistent with various interpretations regarding the relative importance of daily level of smoking and duration of smoking in determining lung cancer risk."